Quote of the weekend

Posted by Ade on Friday, September 5th, 2008 at 4:52 PM

Seeing that the big machine will be switched on next Wednesday:

Anyone who thinks the LHC will destroy the world is a twat.

Prof. Brian Cox, Manchester University

Originally found in The Telegraph.

Edit: That's interesting — since I put up this quote, the Telegraph have changed their version to read “…is a T- - -”. I saw it when it was still written out, so I have it on authority it's not “Tune”, “Tank” or “Tent”.

Leave a comment

No shit, Armstrong...

Posted by Ade on Monday, September 24th, 2007 at 11:56 AM
Travel required!
Travel required!

Although I am fortunate enough not to be looking for a job anymore, an interesting opening was pointed out to me. Unfortunately, I don't fit the profile in several important factors (Not being USian, being less fit than your average portion of fish&chips… although I would just about still fit the age bracket). One thing struck me as a qualified linguistic pedant though: Who on earth (or, as the case may be, off earth) would want to apply for this job if frequent travel was not an option? I mean, these folks travel more in a single go than anybody else, for f's sake!

Leave a comment

TED | Talks | Blaise Agüera y Arcas

Posted by Ade on Tuesday, June 12th, 2007 at 5:31 PM

All I can say is: Holy Shit! I want one of those!

Update: for some reason, the video wouldn't load on my site. So I'll link to it instead.

Leave a comment

All together now: OUCH!

Posted by Ade on Wednesday, May 16th, 2007 at 12:31 PM
IBM and IBM
IBM and IBM

I assume hardly any advert these days is placed by a human redactor who carefully balances the text of the surrounding article with the product or service advertised for.

More’s the pity, really, as I’d love to meet the genius who put an ad for IBM Tivoli management services slap-bang into the middle of an article of severe data loss at IBM. Following my experience with earlier versions of Tivoli Storage Manager on Windows 2003 Server… dead on!

Leave a comment

National Shuffling Association

Posted by Ade on Tuesday, March 13th, 2007 at 11:41 AM
"Der Bund"
"Der Bund"

Today's “Der Bund” mentions the National Riffle Association. Let's see… Wikipedia defines “Riffle” as

Riffle

A common shuffling technique is called a riffle, in which half of the deck is held in each hand with the thumbs inward, then cards are released by the thumbs so that they fall to the table intertwined. Many also lift the cards up after a riffle, forming what is called a bridge which puts the cards back into place.

This can also be done by placing the halves flat on the table with their rear corners touching, then lifting the back edges with the thumbs while pushing the halves together. While this method is a bit more difficult, it is often used in casinos because it minimizes the risk of exposing cards during the shuffle.

That's all nice and good, but what on earth could a society dedicated to shuffling decks of cards possibly have against regulating gun ownership? I do wonder…

2 comments:

Magenta said on Tuesday, March 13th, 2007 at 2:31 PM:

.oO (Ah, wouldn't the world be a better place…)

Magenta said on Tuesday, March 13th, 2007 at 2:34 PM:

As I read the title of your post, I somehow imagined this club of people who refuse to lift their feet properly when walking.

Not the worthiest cause, but there are worse.

Obviously.

Leave a comment

Truth in Advertising

Posted by Ade on Tuesday, October 31st, 2006 at 12:34 PM
A few facts about oil
A few facts about oil

Nice lesson in truth in advertising in today's “Der Bund”

There's an advert, printed in blue, which pollutes the whole page with its colour. The text of the advert: “Some facts about oil, for a change”. So… possible interpretations: “Oil pollutes far beyond expectations”, “Pollution doesn't stop at borders”, “Oil pollutes more than the industry has paid for”… I'm open for additional suggestions…

Leave a comment

Ban Cements Lead in UN Race

Posted by Ade on Tuesday, October 3rd, 2006 at 3:41 PM

This sentence on my Google front page managed to confuse me until I read the corresponding article:

Ban cements lead in UN race

A couple of the weirder improbable interpretations going through my head at the time:

  • Certain glues are banned - and attain a favourable ranking - in an UN motorsport event?
  • Glue containing heavy metal is banned in an UN motorsport event?
  • Heavy metal is firmly established in an UN motorsport event due to some ban?

Need to stop here, head spinning. Having a closer look at the sentence, there's only two words (in and UN) that aren't ambiguous enough to confuse.

Leave a comment

Archive

All posts
2008
2007
May: 1
2006

Tags

All posts: 46
In the news: 7
Huh?: 2
Software: 1
Photography: 1
LHC: 1
Bzzzt-Wrong!: 1